…Inquiry is both natural
and spontaneous state when we are engaged as learners seeking meaning..
-Concept-Based
Curriculum and Instructions for the Thinking Classroom-
(Erickson,
Lanning and French, 2017, p-88)
Imagine
yourself, if you can, in a classroom today at your age as a learner.
Consider the professor, teacher or workshop leader’s style of teaching.
Is it “stand and deliver” or collaborative? Possibly a combination of both? How do
you feel in this class as a student? Engaged,
impatient, tired or preoccupied with other things? If there is something
you could change about the platform for your learning, what would it be? Did you think the teacher was actually
teaching and you were getting what you paid for? Have you ever been in a class
based on inquiry?
Now
consider these questions for a young student sitting in a classroom for six
hours. Think of the different types of people these learners represent;
the studious always engaged student, the reluctant student, the student who
can’t sit still or the socially impulsive student who “in the day” got F’s for
“deportment”. There are many types of people who learn in many different
ways and learning through inquiry, defined by different strategies, we know can
help all learners connect constructively and productively with the subject
matter
Inquiry
can be defined as structured, guided or open. Depending on the content of the lesson, different strategies
can be implemented--or maybe all of them in the same lesson. Experience
has also taught us that inquiry as a teaching strategy can at times be very
uncomfortable for some teachers. They
either see it as a free for all or as giving up control and thus evaluated as a
bad teacher. So, we’d like to explore this whole topic a bit more so you
can better understand why we think inquiry is “at the heart of it”.
The
desire to learn is inherent. We are born with curiosity and the drive to
understand and interact with the world around us. Very young children observe
and imitate. They try to grasp and manipulate objects, move their bodies
towards interesting sounds or sights, and learn through trial and error and
cause and effect.
In
early childhood, ages 3-5, we see the emergence of play. Children are still
imitating what they see and learning by doing. Consider a three-year-old child
exploring water play in a classroom sensory tub. To many onlookers this may not
look like an educational learning opportunity at first glance. It’s “just a
child playing with water.” She fills and empties small containers, stirs the
water with utensils, splashes, and navigates the use of tools and space (both
socially and physically) with other children around her. She may not have the
language to ask the questions but she certainly wonders how all of this works
and is driven to figure it out. When she inadvertently splashes a peer and the
child cries, she’s learning cause and effect. When she stirs the water with a
spoon, she might be modeling something she’s seen a parent do and she’s finding
out that she can use tools to accomplish tasks. When she pours water from one
container to another she is learning about the physics of volume and space, as
well as developing her fine motor skills. She didn’t ask about any of these
things and her teacher may or may not have those intended outcomes in mind. But
from a very young age, humans are inquirers. We want to discover how the world
works.
Dani’s example of inquiry
in action with a group of preschool children:
Creek Ice
Small group hikes at Dodge Nature Preschool offer a multitude of opportunities for young children to engage in inquiry and for teachers to observe and document what the children are learning. While this is not a typical classroom setting, inquiry can happen anywhere at any time. We just need to be mindful and intentional allowing it to happen. Consider ways to encourage inquiry in your own setting. On this particular hike, I spent time with six children as they suddenly veered off-trail and headed to the creek to look at the ice. On that day they noticed many changes and made a lot of observations around ice and water. Here are some of the things they noticed:
Child: This ice is safe – I hit it with my stick and it didn’t break.
Child: Look, there’s ice UNDER ice here.
Teacher: What does that look like, that shape in the ice?
Child: It looks like circles.
Child: Yeah, or bubbles.
Teacher: Yes! Air bubbles trapped in the ice. What happens if you poke at them with your sticks?
Children: They break! That ice isn’t so strong! Let’s call that bubble ice!
Child: The bubble ice is easy to break, and there’s more ice under it.
Child: This looks like a skating pond.
Child: The ice isn’t thick in places where it’s black. I can see water under there.
Teacher: Yes, when I jump on the ice, watch that black spot.
Child: The water moved when you jumped!
Child: Hey, there’s slush on top of the ice here.
Child: Look guys, more water!
Child: This ice looks like it can break because it’s dark.
Child: Look, there’s sticks here. Like a bridge.
Small group hikes at Dodge Nature Preschool offer a multitude of opportunities for young children to engage in inquiry and for teachers to observe and document what the children are learning. While this is not a typical classroom setting, inquiry can happen anywhere at any time. We just need to be mindful and intentional allowing it to happen. Consider ways to encourage inquiry in your own setting. On this particular hike, I spent time with six children as they suddenly veered off-trail and headed to the creek to look at the ice. On that day they noticed many changes and made a lot of observations around ice and water. Here are some of the things they noticed:
Child: This ice is safe – I hit it with my stick and it didn’t break.
Child: Look, there’s ice UNDER ice here.
Teacher: What does that look like, that shape in the ice?
Child: It looks like circles.
Child: Yeah, or bubbles.
Teacher: Yes! Air bubbles trapped in the ice. What happens if you poke at them with your sticks?
Children: They break! That ice isn’t so strong! Let’s call that bubble ice!
Child: The bubble ice is easy to break, and there’s more ice under it.
Child: This looks like a skating pond.
Child: The ice isn’t thick in places where it’s black. I can see water under there.
Teacher: Yes, when I jump on the ice, watch that black spot.
Child: The water moved when you jumped!
Child: Hey, there’s slush on top of the ice here.
Child: Look guys, more water!
Child: This ice looks like it can break because it’s dark.
Child: Look, there’s sticks here. Like a bridge.
The children spent about
half an hour along the edges of the creek testing ice, breaking through weak
spots with their sticks, and finding safe places to step on the ice and on
branches to get to the other side. I think it’s important to note that for
young children, the inquiry process doesn’t always start with a question they
can verbalize. The process starts with curiosity, something they notice and
want to explore. Sometimes they ask questions. Sometimes teachers ask questions
to nudge them toward their own discoveries. Often children compare what they
notice to something else, something familiar. In this instance the children
learned about different states of water, solid and liquid. They learned that
there are layers in ice. They learned about looking closely at the ice and
testing it for safety. They learned that they can use their brains and their
bodies to get themselves safely across the creek. What makes it all so
meaningful is that I didn’t tell them any of that. I followed them to the
creek, made sure they were staying safe while they explored, asked a few
questions, and just let them learn.
These are some examples
of all categories of inquiry working with young children. The same
principles are applied to older students and even adults. As an adult, a form of guided inquiry can be
explained by the following example which, by the way, actually happened and is
one reason I began the study of inquiry as a principle of best practice.
Judy’s example of inquiry
in action with adult learners
At the first meeting of a
graduate course in counseling, we were given the final exam straight out.
I was astonished at this and, to be honest, quite excited. “What a concept” I said to myself. A teacher telling me what I am to learn, what
is important to understand and what he, the teacher, determines to be of value
in my understanding of the content. There were no secrets! The students weren’t guessing and the teacher
was telling us how to uncover that which we were to know. I loved this.
I dug right in and read what I needed to read for understanding. I
listened to lectures for details of knowledge and how things related to each
other and engaged at my level of need and understanding. Wow! My understanding of education and how to
educate changed immediately. What if we
as teachers told the students the standards and details they were to know and
understand and then presented them with alternative strategies to discover
these understandings? All of this led to
my inquiry into inquiry and my professional experience took a new path.
In our next blog we will
explore using inquiry with older children and pull all of our discussions and
examples of inquiry into a conclusion explaining why we feel inquiry is “ at
the heart of it”. Until next time………..